Politicians in a fist fight, news that take them seriously, most Italians who can not listen
Beyond the meaning that can be drawn from the vignette, policy is now no doubt he sees his little. I refer to the continuous and relentless debate that involves, on the one hand, a weak majority trying to keep my head above water, maintaining continuous Opposition attacks and defending their ideas despite the internal fragility, the other is just the 'fierce opposition that, with its constant attacks destabilizzandi and, in the opinion of many, not always in the interest of ' Italian , only repeats the same things: "Prodi resigns" "This majority has proved fragile" "No time!"
course, in dealing with this speech you can not avoid being labeled as belonging to one or the other political movement, the usual and unavoidable marks " are right" "I Left 'however, , as a still Sustaining prepolitical , one that sees every citizen as "interested in his country" before a "team parties," it seems legitimate to state that: there is no room now to the merits of the issues.
Every day we hear the usual things that most stand it by a hair, everything about the opposition has to say only that the majority is weak: he never elaborates on the contents and what is actually done ? Why this perverse mechanism must exist for the majority to be blocked by the opposition? It could not participate in the merits of the opposition "lead" Italy, on which would certainly be equi-distributed?
Certainly the role of the opposition is inherent in his name, I do not deny the importance of their role, but you face as an excuse for a filibuster ... thus takes on a purely literal meaning the phrase "majority vote".
no information on TV, but we have other sources
Television news, after all, are not the only information we have, we can use Internet for the latest in politics, to look into various issues ... In short, we can study more to understand something. While the commitment of the individual to follow the policy is more than welcome, the other is to admit that the only way is to admit that the news does not inform enough about the world political . The allegation of lack of content it must be extended to TV news, guilty of indifference, which broadcasts debates empty without batting an eyelash, and I think that the first revolution of the political system if we would strike every newscast for "lack of serious news" rather than for contracts ...
I do not give, I will continue to be convinced that in politics there is much more than what you see on TV, I will continue to talk to my listeners, but more than that I can do?
0 comments:
Post a Comment